Skip to content

Institutional Causes of Economic Crises & Volatility

Ever wondered how a country’s institutions shape its economic destiny? Dive into this eye-opening analysis that explores how weak institutions can fuel economic instability, crises, and stunt growth, especially in developing nations. Discover why macroeconomic policies alone can’t save the day!



Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  1. What is the main argument of this research? This research argues that a country’s long-run institutional quality is crucial for its macroeconomic performance. Countries with strong institutions, characterized by constraints on the executive branch and protection against expropriation, experience lower volatility, fewer crises, and better growth. Conversely, weak institutions lead to more volatility and crises, even when controlling for standard macroeconomic variables like inflation and government size.

  2. What are the potential mechanisms through which institutions affect macroeconomic outcomes? The research suggests that institutional quality affects volatility and crises through various channels, including:

    • Investment decisions: Strong institutions promote investment by securing property rights and ensuring a predictable policy environment.
    • Political and social stability: Weak institutions may lead to political instability and social conflict, disrupting economic activity.
    • Policy choices: Weak institutions can incentivize unsustainable policies (e.g., excessive borrowing, procyclical fiscal policy), potentially leading to economic crises.
  3. Why are traditional macroeconomic variables not the main drivers of volatility and crises? The research finds that while traditional macroeconomic variables like inflation, exchange rate policies, and government size might play a role, they are often symptoms of underlying institutional problems rather than the fundamental cause of differences in volatility and crises across countries. The institutional environment is identified as the more crucial factor.

  4. How did the researchers measure institutional quality? The researchers used historical data on settler mortality rates in former colonies as an instrumental variable for current institutional quality. The argument is that higher settler mortality rates led European powers to establish “extractive” institutions designed to exploit resources quickly, resulting in weaker institutional quality persisting today. Conversely, lower settler mortality rates allowed for the establishment of more inclusive “settler” institutions focused on protecting property rights, leading to stronger institutional quality.

  5. What is the significance of using settler mortality rates as an instrument? Using settler mortality rates helps address the challenge of endogeneity (reverse causality, where poor economic performance might weaken institutions) and omitted variable bias (where some unobserved factor affects both institutions and economic outcomes). It aims to isolate the causal effect of institutions on macroeconomic performance by using a historical factor (settler mortality) that influenced institutions but is unlikely to directly affect current macroeconomic outcomes except through its impact on institutions.

  6. What evidence supports the claim that institutional quality is a significant determinant of macroeconomic volatility? The empirical analysis, particularly using the instrumental variable approach with settler mortality, demonstrates a robust and statistically significant negative relationship between institutional quality (measured by factors like protection against expropriation risk) and macroeconomic volatility (measured by the standard deviation of GDP growth). Countries with better institutions experience significantly less economic volatility, even after controlling for various macroeconomic policy variables and geographic factors.

  7. Does the relationship between institutions and volatility hold across different time periods? Yes, the study analyzes data over several decades and finds that the negative relationship between institutional quality and macroeconomic volatility is a persistent feature, suggesting that institutions have a long-run impact on economic stability.

  8. What are the implications of this research for policymakers? This research strongly suggests that achieving macroeconomic stability and sustained growth, especially in developing countries, requires a fundamental focus on building and strengthening institutions (e.g., rule of law, property rights protection, constraints on political power). Policy efforts focused solely on managing traditional macroeconomic variables (like inflation targets or fiscal rules) may be insufficient or ineffective in the long run if underlying institutional weaknesses are not addressed.


Resources & Further Watching

💡 Please don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe!


Youtube Hashtags

#economics #macroeconomics #economicgrowth #institutions #volatility #economiccrisis #developmenteconomics #politicaleconomy #propertyrights


Youtube Keywords

economic growth macroeconomics economic volatility economic crises institutions institutional quality property rights rule of law development economics political economy acemoglu johnson robinson thaicharoen settler mortality instrumental variable macroeconomic stability developing countries economic policy expropriation risk constraints on executive economic growth macroeconomics economic growth and development institutional causes macroeconomic symptoms volatility crises growth what are the causes of macroeconomic problems? what are the causes of macroeconomic instability? what is macroeconomics volatility? how does volatility affect economic growth?


Stay Curious. Stay Informed.

Join the ResearchLounge community to get regular updates on the latest breakthroughs in science and technology, delivered clearly and concisely. Subscribe to our channels and never miss an insight.

Help us grow by sharing our content with colleagues, students, and fellow knowledge-seekers!

Your engagement fuels discovery!