Skip to content
ResearchLounge

How Scientists Reconstruct 3D Magnetic Fields at the Nanoscale

Ever wondered how to visualize 3D magnetisation at the nanoscale? This video reveals a breakthrough technique using electron holography & Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) to reconstruct 3D magnetization vector fields (M⃗) in cobalt nanowires—achieving an incredible 50nm resolution!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  1. What is the primary goal of this research? The main objective is to develop a method for characterising 3D magnetic spin structures in nanoscale materials using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) applied to holographic vector field electron tomography (H-VFET) data. This allows for the reconstruction of the 3D magnetisation vector field (M⃗) within nanostructures, which is crucial for advancing 3D magnetic nanoscale technologies like spintronic devices and racetrack memory.

  2. How does MBIR with H-VFET work to reconstruct the 3D magnetisation? The method involves acquiring a tomographic tilt series of electron holograms using off-axis electron holography. These holograms are analysed to measure the magnetic electron phase shift, which is related to the magnetic induction field (B⃗) within the sample. MBIR then uses these phase measurements to iteratively reconstruct a 3D M⃗ distribution that is consistent with the measured phase shifts, providing a detailed map of the magnetic moments within the nanostructure. The workflow consists of data processing and alignment, MBIR reconstruction, and error diagnostics.

  3. What are the key advantages of using this MBIR method compared to other techniques? While X-ray imaging can also reconstruct 3D magnetisation, TEM using H-VFET offers a potentially higher 3D resolution (currently 50 nm, with possibilities for improvement). MBIR also provides an alternative to micromagnetic simulations, which require prior knowledge of the sample’s magnetic properties. In certain cases, MBIR can reconstruct M⃗ without such prior knowledge, making it a valuable tool for characterising complex magnetic nanostructures.

  4. What are the limitations of this MBIR method for magnetisation reconstruction? Several limitations exist. Firstly, the method is susceptible to “null spaces,” where certain M⃗ configurations are invisible to TEM due to projections where M⃗ vector components sum to zero or having non-zero divergence of M⃗. Secondly, external magnetic fields or currents must be absent to ensure that the measured phase shifts are solely due to M⃗. Thirdly, the sample needs to be ferromagnetic for the current MBIR algorithm to function correctly. Reconstruction error also depends on sample type, the angular imaging range, and how well TEM instrument misalignments are corrected.

  5. What is the role of the geometric model in the reconstruction process and how is it created? The geometric model defines the location and shape of the magnetic material within the sample. It is crucial for accurate M⃗ reconstruction. It’s generated through a computed tomography (CT) reconstruction of electrostatic phase images obtained during the H-VFET experiment. SEM images obtained from multiple tilt angles are used to crop the geometric model in order to correct missing wedge artefacts in the CT reconstruction.

  6. What are the main sources of error in the reconstruction, and how are they addressed? Errors stem from beam misalignment, sample drift, rotation, and fabrication damage. They are mitigated using automated alignment, affine transformations, and regularization in the cost function. Fourier shell correlation and optimal estimation assess errors.

  7. What is the significance of the L-shaped cobalt nanowire used in the experiment? As a model for 3D racetrack memory, its geometry creates domain wall pinning sites, making it ideal for testing the reconstruction algorithm’s ability to resolve complex magnetic structures like vortex domain walls.

  8. How can the spatial resolution of this method be further improved in the future? Possible approaches include reducing voxel size, enhancing image drift correction, optimizing reconstruction software for supercomputers, and using electron holography with finer interference fringes. Replacing conjugate gradient minimization with a linear least squares solver may also help.

Resources & Further Watching

💡 Please don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe!

Youtube Hashtags

#science #magneticfields #nanoscale #spintronics #nanowires #research #researchpaper #aipodcast

Youtube Keywords

aurys silinga andrás kovács stephen mcvitie rafal e. dunin-borkowski kayla fallon trevor p. almeida how scientists reconstruct 3d magnetic fields at the nanoscale how are magnetic fields 3d? are artificial magnetic fields possible? is a magnetic field 2d or 3d? can magnetic fields be weaponized? 3d magnetisation magnetic nanostructures electron holography mbir spintronics nanowires magnetization reconstruction nanoscale imaging magnetic fields nano scale

Stay Curious. Stay Informed.

Join the ResearchLounge community to get regular updates on the latest breakthroughs in science and technology, delivered clearly and concisely. Subscribe to our channels and never miss an insight.

Help us grow by sharing our content with colleagues, students, and fellow knowledge-seekers!

Your engagement fuels discovery!

Donte Now